My prediction is that the economy will indeed improve in a Romney
administration, but the deficit situation will get worse. Under Obama the
economy will also improve, but we'll have universal health care so I'm rooting for that. I think an
Obama administration would be better for the deficit because it won't allow the
crazy tax cuts being proposed by GOP.
To further muddy the waters, I'd predict that if Romney is elected
and somehow does indeed follow through with a Ryan-type budget,
successfully cutting spending as much as he says he will, then the economy will
not improve and we'll have a double dip.
Obama doesn't get the credit from me for a Romney-led recovery, by the
way. Improvement in the economy always happens eventually. If Obama loses the
election, liberals like me are going to say he should have pushed for more
stimulus early on when he had the chance- lost opportunity in 2009 is his own
fault.
But then there's this: if Romney wins, and does the following:
- Cuts taxes below even Bush rates
- Increases defense spending
- Cuts programs to the poor, the only deficit-reducing thing on this list (and not enough to make up for the first two items)
- Repeals the ACA, increasing the deficit according to the CBO
Then isn't that a Keynesian policy by Romney? Lowering taxes
and increasing spending in an economic downturn is textbook Keynes.
Romney has already made statements on the stump and in his convention
speech indicating that he buys into Keynes when the subject is military spending
and tax cuts. He complained that the Sequestration military cuts would cost
jobs, a strange statement if he really believes in smaller government as the
most important way to create jobs.
We need to understand that the president is
not King, and is highly constricted by Congress and events out of his control.
That's why I think it's silly to completely blame Obama for failing to create
jobs over the past two years when he's had a Congress that will never pass his
Jobs Bill. And President Romney, if he has a Democratic Senate, will have the
same problem. That's why I give no slack to GWB- he had 6 years of total
control of Congress with no such excuses.
Past predictions are here and here. I've been pretty consistent about 2012 results and the economy so far, but the Moment of Truth comes in the following years.
In 2008 Obama criticized then-President George W. Bush for adding $4 trillion to the national debt, saying it was “unpatriotic” and also “irresponsible” to saddle future generations with such a large national debt.
ReplyDelete“The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion dollars for the first 42 presidents -- number 43 added $4 trillion dollars by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back -- $30,000 for every man, woman and child,” Obama said on July 3, 2008, at a campaign event in Fargo, N.D.
“That's irresponsible. It's unpatriotic,” said candidate Obama.
Comment: The "Brainwashed" (as I call them) know what he said (and worse still) know what he's done. Does it matter? You tell me!